Mythos-Readiness Self-Assessment | OSec

Question 0 of 7 0% Complete

Based on CSA's AI Vulnerability Storm Report

Is Your Security Program Ready for the AI Threat Landscape?

The CSA's Mythos-readiness framework identifies 11 Priority Actions every security program needs to address. Answer 7 questions and find out where you stand.

3 minutes 7 questions Instant results

AI-powered attacks don't wait for your quarterly pen test. Find out if your program is built for today's threat speed.

Pillar 1 — Continuous Testing & Coverage

Question 01 / 07 · PA 7 · PA 11

How frequently does your organization test its full attack surface — including cloud, web apps, APIs, network infrastructure, and third-party dependencies?

Continuously, with automated testing running at all times

Mythos-Ready · PA 11 Operational

Quarterly scheduled assessments

Partial · PA 7 Cadence Gap

Annually or before major audits

Gap · PA 5 Patch Readiness Risk

Ad hoc — only after incidents or compliance triggers

Critical Gap · PA 7

One quick step to unlock the rest

Good start. 6 questions to go.

Enter your work email to unlock the remaining questions and get your personalised Mythos-Readiness score. No spam — just your results.

By continuing, you agree to receive communications from OSec. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pillar 2 — AI Tooling & Agent Adoption

Question 02 / 07 · PA 1 · PA 2 · PA 4

Is your security team currently using AI agents or automated tooling to accelerate vulnerability discovery, triage, or incident response?

Yes — AI agents are embedded across our workflows with governance and controls in place

Mythos-Ready · PA 1 + PA 2 + PA 4

We're piloting AI tools in some areas but without formal oversight

Partial · PA 4 Agent Defense Gap

It's on the roadmap but not yet deployed

Critical Gap · PA 2 — Operating at Human Speed

No — our team operates primarily manually

Critical Gap · PA 1 + PA 2

Question 03 / 07 · PA 7 · PA 8

How do you confirm your attack surface inventory is accurate and current — including shadow IT, new cloud assets, and third-party dependencies?

Automated, continuous discovery — our inventory updates in real time

Mythos-Ready · PA 7 Full Coverage

Regular manual reviews, updated quarterly

Partial · Gaps Likely Between Cycles

We rely on a periodic audit or import from another tool

Gap · PA 7 Coverage Drift Risk

We don't have a formal asset inventory process

Critical Gap · PA 7

Question 04 / 07 · PA 8 · PA 9 · PA 10

How do you know your EDR, SIEM, and WAF are detecting and stopping real-world attacks — not just passing configuration checks?

We run continuous simulated attacks against our controls to validate they work

Mythos-Ready · PA 8 + PA 9

We test controls periodically through red team or purple team exercises

Partial · PA 10 Not Yet Automated

We rely on vendor certifications and audit results

Gap · PA 8 Not Validated Under Real Conditions

We assume they're working if no alerts are firing

Critical Gap · PA 9 + PA 10

Pillar 3 — Patch Velocity & Response Readiness

Question 05 / 07 · PA 5 · PA 10 · PA 11

How long does it typically take your team to patch a critical vulnerability after disclosure?

Less than 24 hours

Mythos-Ready · PA 5 + PA 11 Mature

1–7 days

Partial · Manageable Today, Insufficient as AI Patches Land

1–4 weeks

Critical Gap · Window to Exploitation Now Under 24 Hours

More than a month, or no defined SLA

Critical Gap · PA 10 + PA 11

Pillar 4 — Business Risk Visibility & Governance

Question 06 / 07 · PA 6

How do you currently communicate security exposure to executive leadership or the board?

We report breach probability and business impact tied to revenue-critical systems

Mythos-Ready · PA 6 Risk Models Updated

We share technical metrics with some business context

Partial · PA 6 Translation Gap

We report on compliance status and audit outcomes only

Gap · Pre-AI Risk Framing

Security reporting to leadership is infrequent or informal

Critical Gap · PA 6

Question 07 / 07 · PA 3 · PA 6

If a critical zero-day were disclosed today affecting infrastructure your organization runs, how quickly could your team triage, assess exploitability, and brief your executive team?

Within hours — continuous visibility, pre-built executive reporting, and pre-authorized response playbooks

Mythos-Ready · PA 3 + PA 6 In Place

Within a day — requires some manual analysis and formatting

Partial · PA 6 Partial · PA 3 Not Formalized

Within a week — it's a significant effort across multiple teams

Gap · PA 3 Approval Friction Present

We'd struggle to produce that briefing on short notice

Critical Gap · PA 3 + PA 6

Almost There — One Last Step

Tell us a bit more about yourself to get your full Mythos-Readiness score and personalised Priority Action report.

First Name

Last Name

Company

Job Title

Your results will also be sent to the email you provided. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read the full CSA Mythos-CISO report →

What This Means

Your Answers at a Glance

See What Incenter Finds That Your Current Tools Miss

Book a 30-minute walkthrough and see real findings from environments like yours.

Book Your Free Consultation →