The mission runs. Through everything aimed at it.
Agencies and the defense industrial base keep delivering, while patient, funded, nation-state services spend years trying to get inside. We emulate those adversaries the way they actually operate, and prove the mission stays up. FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC, and NIST 800-53 (RMF) aligned.
What federal government is up against.
Hover or select any one to see what it means.
A peer adversary, not a criminal
The services targeting federal networks answer to other governments: patient, funded, and skilled enough to spend years inside without tripping an alarm.
The intrusion measured in years
The most dangerous compromises aren’t loud. They’re quiet footholds held for months or years, pre-positioned for the moment they matter.
Mission systems at national scale
Federal estates run platforms built decades before the threat: unpatchable, load-bearing, and impossible to simply take offline.
The supply chain is the target
The defense industrial base and the vendors trusted to reach inside are the softest way in, and adversaries have known it for years.
Zero trust, proven — not deployed
The mandate says assume breach and verify everything. A diagram that says “zero trust” and an architecture that survives a real operator are different things.
Full-spectrum offense, locked into one.
The offensive capabilities behind a federal engagement.
Every module is run by senior operators and aligned to the regimes federal systems answer to. One capability, not five vendors.
See the full capability →Buy OSec on a vehicle you already hold.
OSec is available through Carahsoft, the trusted government IT solutions provider and master aggregator. Agencies, integrators, and the defense industrial base can put us on a contract vehicle they already hold, with no new-vendor onboarding and no procurement detour.
Talk to us about procurement →The rules you answer to.
FISMA and the RMF govern federal systems; FedRAMP authorizes the cloud they run on; CMMC extends 800-171 across the defense supply chain; and the federal zero-trust mandate raises the bar again. We run engagements built for these regimes, and find what a determined state adversary would use.
Hover or tap any standard for what it expects and how we test it.
Authorization requires a penetration test against the cloud service offering, with attack vectors and scope defined in the FedRAMP penetration test guidance.
Penetration testing of the in-scope cloud service, aligned to the FedRAMP attack vectors and reported in the format assessors expect.
Federal systems are authorized under the NIST Risk Management Framework (SP 800-37), where control CA-8 requires penetration testing scoped to the system’s FIPS-199 impact level.
CA-8-aligned penetration testing at the right impact level, with findings mapped back to the affected 800-53 controls and the SSP.
Assesses implementation of NIST SP 800-171 controls across the defense supply chain, with higher levels requiring formal third-party assessment of how CUI is protected.
Assessment-aligned testing of CUI handling and the 800-171 control set, focused on the access paths an adversary would actually take.
OMB M-22-09 and EO 14028 push agencies toward a zero-trust architecture, one that assumes breach and verifies every request rather than trusting the network.
Adversary-based testing of the zero-trust design: identity, segmentation, and the lateral movement it is meant to stop, proving it holds, not just that it’s deployed.