The access you grant a vendor is access their attacker inherits.
A signed questionnaire measures a vendor’s paperwork, not the standing access they hold into your systems. When they’re breached, that access is what an attacker walks straight through. Most teams can’t see it until it’s used.
Not sure this is the one? Find your fix →We test the connection, not the paperwork.
Their breach, your problem. We test the standing access, tokens and webhooks each vendor actually holds, not the form they filled in.
- Mail out a questionnaire and treat the answers as assurance
- Point a generic scanner at their perimeter and call the noise “risk”
- Grade a vendor on a form they filled in about themselves
- Hand you theoretical findings with no way to act on them
You trust access that’s been tested.
Every vendor with a standing connection is tested like the way in it is.
You see the suppliers behind your suppliers.
We follow the chain past your direct vendors to the providers behind them: the access you inherited without ever signing for it.
You keep a vendor’s breach out of your core.
We map what a compromised supplier would actually reach inside you, so one vendor’s bad day stays one vendor’s bad day.
Test the vendor, not the questionnaire.
Incenter keeps a live map of every external connection into your environment, flagging new and over-scoped vendor access as it appears.
See the platform →Operators test the integrations themselves: the trust a vendor holds, and what an attacker inherits the day that vendor falls.
Meet the team →of breaches now involve a third party.
Verizon’s 2025 DBIR found third-party involvement doubled year over year. The access you grant a vendor is the access their attacker inherits.
Verizon 2025 DBIR →