Living off the land
Your own admin tools (PowerShell, WMI, PsExec) turned against you.
Expert services · threat hunting
Know you’re clean.
No alerts doesn’t mean no intruder; a capable one keeps your tools quiet and simply waits.
Not ready to scope it? Find your fix →Why us
We hunt for the moves we’d make.
Our hunters spend their days breaking in. We know how an intruder stays quiet, because it’s how we’d do it: which of your own tools they borrow, which logs they avoid, where they sit and wait. We come at your environment from the attacker’s side of the glass, looking for the tradecraft no detection rule was ever written for.
If it were us in there, we know where we’d be hiding.
From our research: Unmasking hidden dangers: the critical need for threat hunting →
Why hunt at all
Silence isn’t all-clear.
Detection waits for a pattern it already knows, and the intruder who matters doesn’t bring one. A valid login here, a borrowed admin tool there, a beacon paced to blend into the noise. Nothing trips. And the longer they sit, the further they reach.
What we hunt for
The moves that don’t trip an alarm.
Every hunt starts from a hypothesis about how a real attacker would operate in your environment. Then we go prove or disprove it in the data.
Valid accounts
Stolen credentials that log in like your staff, from the right places.
Quiet C2
Beacons paced to blend into ordinary outbound traffic.
Persistence
A foothold built to survive a reboot, a patch, a password reset.
Lateral movement
Host to host on trusted access, no exploit required.
How it runs
Hypothesis first. Then the data.
01
Hypothesis
Built from current attacker tradecraft: a specific behaviour to prove or rule out.
02
Hunt the telemetry
Run across your logs and endpoints, by hand, not a tool left to alert on its own.
03
Find the gaps
Where you’re blind, and exactly what to log so the next intrusion can’t stay quiet.
04
Tune detections
The behaviour becomes a detection, left behind in your stack.
Detections in your stackcompounding
↺ Each hunt leaves detections behind. The next one starts ahead.
What you walk away with
Evidence, either way.
A hunt ends one of two ways, and both are worth paying for: proof of a compromise, or a documented all-clear. The difference is that you now know, instead of assuming.
Findings, with evidence
A compromise, or a documented all-clear.
A prioritised gap list
Where you’re blind, ranked by what matters.
Tuned detections
The behaviour becomes an alert — the next hunt starts ahead.
A repeatable playbook
The hunt, documented for your team to run again.
Scoped to your telemetry sources and the size of your environment.