One platform, one provider, not a dozen renewals.
Security spend rarely grows by decision. It grows by accumulation: another tool, another vendor, another integration, another renewal nobody questions. We replace the sprawl with one tested layer you can account for.
A dozen tools, a dozen renewals, and no one view.
Every point tool came in to solve one problem and stayed. Now you license, integrate and staff a stack that overlaps in places, leaves gaps in others, and reports in a dozen dialects. The spend compounds; the clarity doesn’t.
Less to run, nothing left untested.
One platform and one provider for the testing layer: fewer licences, fewer integrations, one number to report, without trading away coverage to get there.
The saving comes from one move: collapsing the testing layer into a single platform.
platform instead of a stack of point tools
One layer to license, integrate and report, replacing the testing tools you renew out of habit.
Consolidating the tools is half of it; consolidating the vendors is the rest.
Three levers, one outcome.
Collapse the testing layer
Incenter replaces a dozen point tools with one: attack-surface, validation and reporting in a single platform, less to license and integrate.
See what Incenter replaces →02Rationalise the stack
A program review puts every tool against the risk it actually removes, so you keep what works and stop what overlaps.
Program review & vCISO →03One provider for the offense
Penetration testing, red and purple teaming, AI and special projects under one roof: one relationship instead of a procurement list.
Expert services →lower than the point tools it replaces.
Illustrative; your figure is modelled against your current stack.
What consolidation returns:
- Fewer licences, integrations and renewals to manage
- One number to report, not a dozen dialects
- Coverage proven, not assumed from the logos you own
Put the levers to work, and the before-and-after looks like this.