One platform, one provider, not eight renewals.
Security spend rarely grows by decision. It grows by accumulation: another tool, another vendor, another integration, another renewal nobody questions. We replace the sprawl with one tested layer you can account for.
Eight tools, eight renewals, and no one view.
Every point tool came in to solve one problem and stayed. Now you license, integrate and staff a stack that overlaps in places, leaves gaps in others, and reports in a dozen dialects. The spend compounds; the clarity doesn’t.
Less to run, nothing left untested.
One platform and one provider for your testing tools: fewer licenses, fewer integrations, one number to report, without trading away coverage to get there.
The saving comes from one move: collapsing your testing tools into a single platform.
platform instead of a stack of single-purpose tools
One layer to license, integrate and report, replacing the testing tools you renew out of habit.
Consolidating the tools is half of it; consolidating the vendors is the rest.
Three levers, one outcome.
Collapse your testing tools
Incenter replaces eight single-purpose tools with one: attack-surface, validation and reporting in a single platform, less to license and integrate.
See what Incenter replaces →02Rationalise the stack
A program review puts every tool against the risk it actually removes, so you keep what works and stop what overlaps.
Program review & advisory →03One provider for all of it
Penetration testing, red-team and purple-team engagements, AI and special projects under one roof: one relationship instead of a procurement list.
Expert services →lower than the single-purpose tools it replaces.
Your figure is modelled against your current stack.
What consolidation returns:
- Fewer licenses, integrations and renewals to manage
- One number to report, not a dozen dialects
- Coverage proven, not assumed from the logos you own
Put the levers to work, and the before-and-after looks like this.