Why Incenter

The patch window didn’t shrink. It inverted.

Attackers now exploit vulnerabilities, on average, seven days before a patch publicly exists, while defenders still need weeks to patch (Google Mandiant M-Trends 2026). You can’t patch faster than they exploit. Incenter tests continuously, so you know which exposures are actually reachable, and fix those first.

63 daysaverage time-to-exploit, 2018two months to patch first
−1 day2024: exploited before the patchthe window crosses zero
−7 days2025: the window is negativeGoogle Mandiant M-Trends 2026 →
Point-in-time vs continuous

One test a year. 51 weeks unwatched.

A point-in-time test still fits a specialist system that barely changes — we run those too. Everything else moves.

Once a year
Incenter
How often
Once a yearOnce, then silence
Incenter✓Continuously
New code & assets
Once a yearUntested till next year
Incenter✓Tested as they ship
Your fixes
Once a yearVerified next year
Incenter✓Re-tested automatically
What you get
Once a yearA report, one point in time
Incenter✓Findings proven, kept current

See what we’d find in 10 days.

We point Incenter at your real environment, and inside ten days you see exactly what a once-a-year test would miss — before you decide anything.

Scope it →Not ready to talk? See a real report →
One platform, not eight subscriptions

It also replaces the stack you’d otherwise assemble.

You could buy…
…or use Incenter
ASMAttack Surface Management
✓Mapped continuously
VM / RBVMVulnerability Management
✓Included
DASTDynamic App Security Testing
✓Included
BASBreach & Attack Simulation
✓Included, taken further
ASVAutomated Security Validation
✓Proven by exploitation
CNAPPCloud Security
✓Included
TIThreat Intelligence
✓Tuned to what you run
EMExposure Management
✓This is Incenter

On one engagement, 847 raw findings from a tool stack became the 23 proven, reachable and ranked. The acronym soup, in full →